Why semantic innocence?

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (4):445 – 454 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper rejects the imposition of "semantic innocence" as a constraint on semantic theories. In particular, it argues that recent attempts to justify the imposition of "semantic innocence" as a constraint on semantic theories fail.

Similar books and articles

Underdetermination and the principles of semantic theory.George Powell - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):271–278.
Semantic innocence and psychological understanding.Jennifer Hornsby - 1989 - Philosophical Perspectives 3:549-574.
Semantic Innocence and Uncompromising Situations.Jon Barwise & John Perry - 1981 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 (1):387-404.
Rethinking the presumption of innocence.Victor Tadros - 2006 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (2):193-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
246 (#79,461)

6 months
72 (#60,683)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

Fictionalism About Fictional Characters Revisited.Stuart Brock - 2016 - Res Philosophica 93 (2):377-403.
Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references