Time, Successive Addition, and Kalam Cosmological Arguments

Philosophia Christi 3 (1):181-192 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Craig (1981) presents and defends several different kalam cosmological arguments. The core of each of these arguments is the following ur argument.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5840/pc20013112

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A response to Graham Oppy.David S. Oderberg - unknown
Arguing About The Kalam Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (1):34-61.
J. Howard Sobel on the Kalam Cosmological Argument.William Lane Craig - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):565-84.
A swift and simple refutation of the Kalam cosmological argument?William Lane Craig - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (1):57-72.
Worlds apart: On the possibility of an actual infinity.Josh Dever - unknown
In Defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument.William Lane Craig - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):236-247.
Reply to professor Craig.Graham Oppy - 1995 - Sophia 34 (2):15-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-12-20

Downloads
1,018 (#12,469)

6 months
235 (#9,633)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

All the time in the world.Alex Malpass - 2022 - Mind 131 (523):786-804.
Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.
More Than a Flesh Wound.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Ars Disputandi 2:214-224.
Craig’s Kalam Cosmology.Graham Oppy - 2009 - Philo 12 (2):200-216.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references