Salmon on the contingent a priori and the necessary a posteriori

Philosophical Studies 73 (1):5 - 33 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is an examination of the contingent a priori and the necessary a posteriori. In particular, it considers -- and assesses -- the criticisms that Nathan Salmon makes of the views of Saul Kripke.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
650 (#25,053)

6 months
109 (#34,579)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

Donnellan on neptune.Robin Jeshion - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):111-135.
Rigid designators.Joseph LaPorte - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hyper-reliability and apriority.James Pryor - 2006 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (3):327–344.
Ways of taking a meter.Robin Jeshion - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 99 (3):297-318.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reference and Contingency.Gareth Evans - 1979 - The Monist 62 (2):161-189.
Beyond belief.Daniel C. Dennett - 1982 - In Andrew Woodfield (ed.), Thought And Object: Essays On Intentionality. New York: Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Relative and Absolute Apriority.Nathan Salmon - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 69 (1):83 - 100.

Add more references