Reply to Richard Davis

Philosophia Christi 11 (2):423-436 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a response to a paper by Rich Davis in which he argues that David Lewis' modal realism is inconsistent with classical theism. I provide what I take to be a coherent modal realist formulation of classical theism.

Similar books and articles

Davis on enjoyment: A reply.Richard Warner - 1983 - Mind 92 (368):568-572.
Warner on Enjoyment.Wayne A. Davis - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:553-555.
Impossible worlds.Brian Leftow - 2006 - Religious Studies 42 (4):393-402.
Reply to Davis.E. J. Lowe - 1980 - Analysis 40 (4):187 - 190.
Reply to Blum.Wayne A. Davis - 1993 - Philosophia 22 (1-2):211-218.
Reply to Davis.Michael Martin - 1999 - Philo 2 (1):62-76.
A reply to Davis.Arthur R. Miller - 1985 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (3):457-458.
In defence of 'partially clad' bare particulars.Timothy Pickavance - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):155 – 158.
Reply to Corrado.Michael Davis - 1996 - Criminal Justice Ethics 15 (2):29-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-21

Downloads
257 (#75,836)

6 months
54 (#77,515)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

God’s place in the world.Matthew James Collier - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (1):43-65.
God’s Place in Logical Space.Andrew Dennis Bassford - 2021 - Journal of Analytic Theology 9:100-125.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Modal theistic arguments.Graham Oppy - 1993 - Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
A Leibnizian cosmological argument.Brian Leftow - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 57 (2):135 - 155.
God and Modal Concretism.Richard Davis - 2008 - Philosophia Christi 10 (1):57-74.

Add more references