O'Connor's Cosmological Argument

Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Vol. 3 3 (1):166 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter is a critical discussion of the third chapter of Tim O'Connor's *Theism and Ultimate Explanation*. In this chapter, O'Connor advances the 'existence stage' of his cosmological argument from contingency. I argue that naturalists have good reason to think that on each of the live hypotheses -- infinite regress, brute contingency, brute necessity -- naturalism is preferable to theism.

Other Versions

reprint Oppy, Graham (2011) "O'Connor's Cosmological Argument". In Kvanvig, Jonathan L., Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 3, pp. : Oxford University Press (2011)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
973 (#19,154)

6 months
126 (#39,165)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

Divine Causation.Graham Oppy - 2017 - Topoi 36 (4):641-650.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references