Countable fusion not yet proven guilty: it may be the Whiteheadian account of space whatdunnit

Analysis 57 (4):249-253 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I criticise a paper by Peter Forrest in which he argues that a principle of unrestricted countable fusion has paradoxical consequences. I argue that the paradoxical consequences that he exhibits may be due to his Whiteheadean assumptions about the nature of spacetime rather than to the principle of unrestricted countable fusion.

Similar books and articles

On countable choice and sequential spaces.Gonçalo Gutierres - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (2):145-152.
Compact Metric Spaces and Weak Forms of the Axiom of Choice.E. Tachtsis & K. Keremedis - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (1):117-128.
The Ultrafilter Closure in ZF.Gonçalo Gutierres - 2010 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 56 (3):331-336.
Countable Fréchetα 1-spaces may be first countable.Alan Dow & Juris Stepräns - 1992 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (1):33-50.
Projective subsets of separable metric spaces.Arnold W. Miller - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 50 (1):53-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
355 (#53,896)

6 months
94 (#41,929)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

Mereology.Achille C. Varzi - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Weak Location.Antony Eagle - 2019 - Dialectica 73 (1-2):149-181.
Oppy, infinity, and the neoclassical concept of God.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (1):25 - 37.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references