Hume's Social Epistemology and the Dialogue Form

Episteme:1-16 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hume begins his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion by providing a discussion on what an ideal dialogue ought to look like. Many considerations that Hume raises coincide with similar concerns in contemporary social epistemology. This paper examines three aspects of Hume’s social epistemology: epistemic peerhood, inquiry norms and the possibility of rational persuasion. Interestingly, however, I will argue that the conversation between Philo, Cleanthes and Demea falls short of meeting Hume’s articulated standard of what an ideal dialogue ought to look like. From this analysis, I defend the less popular view that Demea’s decision to leave the conversation (in Part XI) was entirely reasonable and suggest an explanation for why Hume decided to make Cleanthes the ‘hero’ of the Dialogues.

Similar books and articles

Hume’s Uses of Dialogue.Samuel Clark - 2013 - Hume Studies 39 (1):61-76.
Dialogues concerning natural religion and other writings.David Hume (ed.) - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hume: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion: And Other Writings.Dorothy Coleman (ed.) - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hume's Dialogues concerning Natural Religion.B. M. Laing - 1937 - Philosophy 12 (46):175 - 190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-23

Downloads
178 (#101,584)

6 months
103 (#33,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daryl Ooi
National University of Singapore

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
Inquiry and Belief.Jane Friedman - 2017 - Noûs 53 (2):296-315.
The logic of deep disagreements.Robert Fogelin - 1985 - Informal Logic 7 (1):3-11.
Deep disagreement and hinge epistemology.Chris Ranalli - 2020 - Synthese 197 (11):4975-5007.

View all 19 references / Add more references