Apparent distance as a function of familiar size

Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):109 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0026879

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Size constancy and the problem of perceptual spaces.Humberto R. Maturana, Samy G. Frenk & Francisco G. Varela - 1972 - Cognition 1 (1):97-104.
Familiar and relative size cues and surface texture as determinants of relative distance judgments.Colin V. Newman - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (1):37.
The influence of size of test stimuli, interpupillary distance, and age on stereoscopic depth perception.L. C. Mead - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (2):148.
Supplementary report: Effect of mode of response on judgment of familiar size.A. V. Churchill - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):198.
Familiar size as a cue to size in the presence of conflicting cues.Charles W. Slack - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (3):194.
Berkeley, helmholtz, the moon illusion, and two visual systems.Helen E. Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.
Familiar size and judgments of distance: Effects of response mode.John Predebon - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (4):244-246.
The interrelationship between the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions.Joan S. Girgus, Stanley Coren & Myra Agdern - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):453.
Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception.J. C. Baird - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (2):155.
Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line.Theodor M. Künnapas - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (3):168.
The role of perceived distance in determining apparent visual size.Leonard Brosgole, Thomas J. PlaHovinsak, Miguel Roig & Joseph P. Notaro - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (6):489-492.
Assumed distance as a determinant of apparent size.Fern A. Singer, Zita E. Tyer & Robert Pasnak - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 19 (5):267-268.
Relative size in isolation as a stimulus for relative perceived distance.William Epstein & Stephen S. Baratz - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):507.
Accuracy of absolute visual distance and size estimation in space as a function of stereopsis and motion parallax.James W. Dees - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3):466.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
15 (#893,994)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references