Radical Democratic Inclusion: Why We Should Lower the Voting Age to 12

Abstract

Democratic societies such as the United Kingdom have come to fail their young citizens, often sacrificing their interests in a political process that gives much greater weight to the preferences and interests of older citizens. Against this background of intergenerational injustice, this article presents the case for a shift in the political system in the direction of radical democratic inclusion of younger citizens, through reducing the voting age to 12. This change in the voting age can be justified directly, with reference to the status, interests, and capacities of younger citizens, and it can also be justified as a remedy to existing forms of intergenerational injustice. This change in the voting age would require a parallel transformation in the role of secondary schools as part of the ‘critical infrastructure' of a democratic society, which would be part of a broader shift towards a more genuinely democratic political culture. The proposal is defended against less radical alternatives and more radical alternatives. The article concludes with some reflections on democracy and intergenerational justice in light of the Covid pandemic and the climate emergency.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-07

Downloads
10 (#907,144)

6 months
10 (#74,047)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin O'Neill
University of York

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
What Should Egalitarians Believe?Martin O'neill - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2):119-156.
Why the Voting Age Should Be Lowered to 16.Tommy Peto - 2018 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (3):277-297.
Survey Article: Philosophy and Public Policy After Piketty.Martin O'Neill - 2017 - Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (3):343-375.
Contradictions of Capital and Care.Nancy Fraser - 2016 - New Left Review 100:99-117.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ethical Considerations on Quadratic Voting.Ben Laurence & Itai Sher - 2017 - Public Choice 1 (172):175-192.
Methods of Democratic Decision-Making.Richard Schmitt - 2018 - Radical Philosophy Review 21 (1):129-151.
Political Testimony.Han van Wietmarschen - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (1):23-45.
Inclusion and Participation: Working with the Tensions.Gideon Calder - 2011 - Studies in Social Justice 5 (2):183-196.