Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):482-483 (2021)
AbstractUnder conditions with a low level of available genetic information, mutualistic private insurance markets will often create broadly just outcomes, even if by accident rather than by design. Normatively acceptable outcomes of this kind would come under threat if insurers were to have increased access to genetic information with substantial predictive content.1 As the availability of relevant individual genetic information grows, mutualistic forms of market-based insurance face a dilemma between either sacrificing individuals’ interests in genetic privacy, or creating conditions for market failure due to adverse selection. My view is therefore that we have good reason to shift towards more solidaristic forms of ‘risk-sharing institutions’ with regard to functions such as life insurance and critical illness insurance, as a way of resolving normative tensions between values of equality, privacy, non-discrimination and autonomy. Such a position, I have argued, does not depend on endorsing any particular conception of social justice, but can be defended on the basis of a number of different plausible accounts of what justice demands.1 Jonathan Pugh argues against my endorsement of a shift towards solidaristic, non-market risk-sharing institutions, and instead argues broadly in favour of the status quo. He holds that it counts against my proposals that they ‘have wide-ranging and highly revisionary implications’, and argues that my approach is mistaken in relying on ‘a single contestable theory’. Pugh offers a purportedly less contestable account of the relevant normative considerations underlying insurance regimes, composed of three …
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Genetic Exceptionalism, Revisionism, Pluralism and Convergence in the Ethics of Insurance: Response to Commentators.Jonathan Pugh - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics:medethics-2022-108153.
Similar books and articles
Social Insurance, Mutualistic Insurance and Genetic Information.Eli Feiring - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):486-487.
Reassessing Insurers' Access to Genetic Information: Genetic Privacy, Ignorance, and Injustice.Eli Feiring - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (5):300-310.
Genetic Information, Insurance and a Pluralistic Approach to Justice.Jonathan Pugh - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):473-479.
The Use of Genetic Test Information in Insurance: The Argument From Indistinguishability Reconsidered. [REVIEW]Dr V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
The Use of Genetic Test Information in Insurance: The Argument From Indistinguishability Reconsidered.V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
Insurance Companies' Access to Genetic Information: Why Regulation Alone is Not Enough.Niklas Juth - 2003 - Monash Bioethics Review 22 (1):25-41.
Is Genetic Information Relevantly Different From Other Kinds of Non-Genetic Information in the Life Insurance Context?P. J. Malpas - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (7):548-551.
Social Justice and the Future of Flood Insurance.John O'Neill & Martin O'Neill - 2012 - Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Genetic Information, Discrimination, Philosophical Pluralism and Politics.Søren Holm - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):480-481.
Genetic Discrimination and Health Insurance.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2015 - Res Publica 21 (2):185-199.
Regulating Risk: Defining Genetic Privacy in the United States and Britain.Shobita Parthasarathy - 2004 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 29 (3):332-352.
Genetic Information: Making a Just World Strange.Iain Brassington - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (3):231-246.
Genes and Insurance: Ethical, Legal and Economic Issues.Marcus Radetzki, Marian Radetzki & Niklas Juth - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
Predictive Genetic Testing: Congruence of Disability Insurers' Interests with the Public Interest.Anita Silvers - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (S2):52-58.
Genetic Screening and Disability Insurance: What Can We Learn From the Health Insurance Experience?Nancy Kass & Amy Medley - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (S2):66-73.