Explaining ‘The Hardness of the Logical Must’: Wittgenstein on Grammar, Arbitrariness and Logical Necessity
Philosophical Investigations 24 (1):1-29 (2001)
AbstractThis paper explains Wittegnstein’s understanding of the ‘grammar’ of our language, tracing its origins in the Tractatus’s concept of logical syntax, and then examining the senses in which Wittegnstein, in his later work, viewed grammar as being ‘arbitrary’. Then, armed with this understanding, it moves on to the task of examining how, within the framework of a Wittegnsteinian view of language, we should understand the inescapable ‘compellingness’ of logical necessity – what Wittegnstein calls the “hardness of the logical must”. Whereas it is often thought that Wittegnstein’s views on the nature of the ‘grammar’ of our concpets leads him towards a vitiatingly conventionalist or anti‐realist understanding of necessity, in which its logical ‘superhardness’ becomes problematic, this paper will argue that there is actually no such tension in Wittegnstein’s thought. In fact, it will be argued, an understanding of the ways in which our conceptual grammar is arbitrary casts a great deal of light on how it is that our concepts can nevertheless support a logically superhard, and normatively commanding, notion of necessity. In support of this view, I distinguish Wittegnstein’s views on necessity from the ‘classical’ conventionalism of the Vienna Circle, and from the radical conventionalism of Michael Dummett, and defend Wittegnstein’s view from a powerful recent attack from Quassim Cassam.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Explaining 'the Hardness of the Logical Must': Wittgenstein on Grammar, Arbitrariness and Logical Necessity.Martin O'Neill - 2001 - Philosophical Investigations 24 (1):1–29.
Wittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar.Michael N. Forster - 2004 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Wittgenstein and Logical Necessity.A. B. Levison - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):367-373.
The Struggle Against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy.Oskari Kuusela - 2008 - Harvard University Press.
Wittgenstein-- Rules, Grammar, and Necessity: Essays and Exegesis of 185-242.Gordon P. Baker - 2009 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Necessity of Thought.Cesare Cozzo - 2015 - In Heinrich Wansing (ed.), Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning. Springer. pp. 101-20.
In What Way Does Logic Involve Necessity?Sanford Shieh - 2014 - Philosophical Topics 42 (2):289-337.
Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity: An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations.Gordon Baker & P. M. S. Hacker - 1991 - Wiley-Blackwell.
On the Reduction of Necessity to Essence.Fabrice Correia - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):639-653.
The Logical Status of Brain Death Criteria.G. J. Agich & R. P. Jones - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (4):387-396.
A Counterfactual Analysis of the Concepts of Logical Truth and Necessity.Marc Lange - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 125 (3):277-303.