Conflict between anthropic reasoning and observation

Analysis 64 (1):1-8 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/64.1.1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Conflict between anthropic reasoning and observation.Ken D. Olum - 2004 - Analysis 64 (1):1–8.
Anthropic reasoning does not conflict with observation.Dien Ho & Bradley Monton - 2005 - Analysis 65 (1):42–45.
Anthropic Reasoning in Cosmology: A Historical Perspective.Stefano Bettini - 2005 - In Formale Teleologie Und Kausalitã¤T in der Physik. Mentis Verlag.
Anthropic reasoning in multiverse cosmology and string theory.Steven Weinstein - unknown
The Role of the Protocol in Anthropic Reasoning.Joseph Y. Halpern - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2:195-206.
Ernan McMullin on Anthropic Reasoning in Cosmology.Robert J. Deltete - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2):321-330.
Anthropic explanations in cosmology.Jesus Mosterin - unknown
Anthropic bias: observation selection effects in science and philosophy.Nick Bostrom - 2002 - New York: Routledge.
Conditions of Knowledge: The Weak Anthropic Principle, Selection Effects, Transcendental Arguments and Provisoes.Sherrilyn Marie Roush - 1999 - Dissertation, Harvard University
The anthropic argument against the existence of God.Mark Walker - 2009 - Sophia 48 (4):351 - 378.
The Anthropic Principle: A Primer for Philosophers.Frank J. Tipler - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:27 - 48.
Firing squads and fine-tuning: Sober on the design argument.Jonathan Weisberg - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):809-821.
A Bayesian General Theory of Anthropic Reasoning.David Shulman - unknown
Anthropic fluctuations vs. weak anthropic principle.Milan M. Ćirković - 2002 - Foundations of Science 7 (4):453-463.
Fine-tuning arguments and the concept of law.John Halpin - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
47 (#331,642)

6 months
16 (#149,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Cosmic Confusions: Not Supporting versus Supporting Not.John D. Norton - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (4):501-523.
Philosophical Implications of Inflationary Cosmology.Joshua Knobe, Ken D. Olum & Alexander Vilenkin - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):47-67.
Philosophical implications of inflationary cosmology.Joshua Knobe, Ken D. Olum & And Alexander Vilenkin - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):47-67.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
The doomsday argument and the number of possible observers.Ken D. Olum - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):164-184.
The End of the World.John Leslie - 2000 - Mind 109 (433):155-158.
Philosophical Implications of Inflationary Cosmology.Joshua Knobe, Ken D. Olum & Alexander Vilenkin - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):47-67.

View all 9 references / Add more references