Why justice and injustice have no place outside the Hobbesian State

European Journal of Political Theory 14 (1):19-36 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite the signpost prominence of Hobbesian positions in theories of international relations and global justice, the ground and nature of Hobbes’s claim that justice and injustice are non-existent outside the State are poorly understood. This paper aims to provide the first comprehensive explanation of this doctrine . I argue that Hobbes offers two distinct arguments for Justicial Statism: the Covenant and the Propriety Argument. Each argument is premised on a different conception of justice and stresses different implications of the natural right to all things. The Propriety Argument is based on distributive justice. First introduced in Leviathan, this argument has received little scholarly attention, although it is no trivial addition: the Covenant Argument alone cannot establish Justicial Statism. My reconstruction highlights two further, hitherto ignored presuppositions of Hobbes’s Justicial Statism: his rejection of natural rights governed by justice and his claim that violations of natural law do not wrong non-divine agents

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant against Hobbes: Reasoning and rhetoric.Gabriella Slomp - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):207-222.
Global migratory potential and the scope of justice.Richard Child - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):282-300.
The concept of injustice.Eric Heinze - 2013 - New York,: Routledge.
Justice and morality beyond naïve cosmopolitanism.Lea Ypi - 2010 - Ethics and Global Politics 3 (3):171-192.
Distributive Justice, Injustice and Beyond Justice.Wei Xiaopin - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:857-872.
On global justice.Mathias Risse - 2012 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
The Limits of Background Justice.Thomas Porter Sinclair - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):352-372.
Law after modernity.Sionaidh Douglas-Scott - 2013 - Portland, Or.: Hart.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-14

Downloads
37 (#431,825)

6 months
5 (#641,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Johan Olsthoorn
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

The natural right to slack.Stanislas Richard - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (N/A).

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references