On the Absence of Moral Goodness in Hobbes’s Ethics

The Journal of Ethics 24 (2):241-266 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article reassesses Hobbes’s place in the history of ethics based on the first systematic analysis of his various classifications of formal goodness. The good was traditionally divided into three: profitably good, pleasurably good, and morally good. Across his works, Hobbes replaced the last with pulchrum—a decidedly non-moral form of goodness on his account. I argue that Hobbes’s dismissal of moral goodness was informed by his hedonist conception of the good and accompanied by reinterpretations of right reason and natural law. By dispensing moral goodness and insisting on the hedonist and relational nature of the good, Hobbes moreover recast and rendered more urgent the question of why we should be moral. Hobbes is commonly thought to have raised this question so starkly because of his general insensitivity to the demands of justice. My analysis suggests that it may also, or rather, have been due to his restrictive conception of the good. A comparison with other moral philosophers from the period—including Suárez, Gassendi, Locke, and Pufendorf—indicates how unusual Hobbes’s jettisoning of moral goodness was.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In Defense of an End-Relational Account of Goodness.Brian Coffey - 2014 - Dissertation, University of California, Davis
Beneficence/Benevolence: WILLIAM K. FRANKENA.William K. Frankena - 1987 - Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (2):1-20.
Goodness and Moral Twin Earth.Christopher Freiman - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (2):445-460.
Thomas Hobbes and the science of moral virtue.David Boonin - 1994 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Hobbes and the Science of Moral Virtue.Andrew Alexandra - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (185):550.
On the Tedium of the Good.Samantha Vice - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):459-476.
Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics.Arash Abizadeh - 2018 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
On Mencius' Aesthetic Theory of Human Character.Xin Liu - 1997 - Philosophy and Culture 24 (9):882-889.
God and Good Revisited: A Case for Contingency.Bruce Reichenbach - 2014 - Philosophia Christi 16 (2):319-338.
Thomas Hobbes and the Science of Moral Virtue.David Boonin-Vail - 1994 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Why Is God Good?Bruce Reichenbach - 1980 - Journal of Religion 60 (1):51-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-11

Downloads
34 (#470,728)

6 months
11 (#238,613)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Johan Olsthoorn
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Practical philosophy.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mary J. Gregor.
The morality of happiness.Julia Annas - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Two distinctions in goodness.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):169-195.
Rethinking intrinsic value.Shelly Kagan - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (4):277-297.

View all 68 references / Add more references