Dahlman and Mackor on Coherence and Probability in Legal Evidence

Law, Probability and Risk (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2019

DOI

10.1093/lpr/mgz017

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Against coherence: truth, probability, and justification.Erik J. Olsson - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, Justification. [REVIEW]Tomoji Shogenji - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):292-296.
Coherence, evidence, and legal proof.Amalia Amaya - 2013 - Legal Theory 19 (1):1-43.
Coherence and probability: A probabilistic account of coherence.Roche William - 2013 - In Michal Araszkiewicz & Jaromír Šavelka (eds.), Coherence: Insights from Philosophy, Jurisprudence and Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 59-91.
Why does coherence appear truth-conducive?Tomoji Shogenji - 2007 - Synthese 157 (3):361 - 372.
A Note on the Equivalence of Coherence and Constrained Coherence.Paolo Vicig - 2016 - Minds and Machines 26 (3):303-305.
Dynamic coherence and probability kinematics.Brian Skyrms - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):1-20.
Verstehen, einfhlen and mental simulation: Reply to Anne Rugh Mackor.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - In Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. New York: Rodopi NY. pp. 263-267.
The defeasible nature of coherentist justification.Staffan Angere - 2007 - Synthese 157 (3):321 - 335.
Unacceptable Generalizations in Arguments on Legal Evidence.Christian Dahlman - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (1):83-99.
Review: Against Coherence: Truth, Probability, and Justification. [REVIEW]C. B. Cross - 2006 - Mind 115 (459):790-793.
Causation, Association, and Confirmation.Gregory Wheeler & Richard Scheines - 2010 - In Stephan Hartmann, Marcel Weber, Wenceslao Gonzalez, Dennis Dieks & Thomas Uebe (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation: New Trends and Old Ones Reconsidered. Springer. pp. 37--51.
Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence.Amalia Amaya - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (3):304-329.
A Scenario Approach to the Simonshaven Case.Peter J. van Koppen & Anne Ruth Mackor - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1132-1151.
Is coherence conducive to reliability?Stefan Schubert - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):607-621.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-13

Downloads
20 (#703,484)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Erik J. Olsson
Lund University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Bayesian Epistemology.Luc Bovens & Stephan Hartmann - 2003 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by Stephan Hartmann.
An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation.Clarence Irving Lewis - 1946 - La Salle, IL, USA: Open Court.
An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation.C. I. Lewis - 1949 - Review of Metaphysics 2 (7):99-115.
Is coherence truth conducive?T. Shogenji - 1999 - Analysis 59 (4):338-345.
What is the problem of coherence and truth?Erik J. Olsson - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy 99 (5):246-272.

View all 17 references / Add more references