Putnam on Artifactual Kind Terms

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (1):197-212 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Putnam’s suggestion of extending the scope of his semantic theory has opened an ongoing debate. The majority seem to agree with Putnam as long as he restricts his analysis to natural kind terms, whereas many doubts have arisen about whether or not it can be applied to artifactual kind terms as well. Specifically, this disagreement originated with the thought experiment that Putnam laid out in order to prove his controversial thesis. Here I analyze it in detail in order to evaluate whether it proves what it has been alleged to prove. Unlike the other authors engaged in the debate, I point out that this particular argument cannot demonstrate that artifactual words refer externalistically. I claim that, on closer inspection, Putnam’s thought experiment only shows that an artifactual term like ‘pencil’ can turn out to be a natural kind word, but, in the end, it tells us little about how our “actual” artifactual kind terms work. In order to make my point, I also bring out the two fundamental requirements that a genuine externalist argument about artifactual words ought to meet. Finally, I report, albeit briefly, the main externalist accounts in this respect, illustrating how none of them actually meet the challenge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reevaluando la tesis Kripke-Putnam.Pierre Baumann - 2013 - Argumentos (9):270-294.
Pencils Have a Point: Against General Externalism About Artifactual Words.Diego Marconi - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):497-513.
Are natural kind terms special?Åsa Wikforss - 2010 - In Helen Beebee & Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Routledge.
Putnam on the Meaning of Natural Kind Terms.Bernard Linsky - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):819 - 828.
Naming natural kinds.Åsa Maria Wikforss - 2005 - Synthese 145 (1):65-87.
Moral Twin Earth, Intuitions, and Kind Terms.Heimir Geirsson - 2014 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):91-110.
Can the World Help Us in Fixing the Reference of Natural Kind Terms?Igor Douven & Jaap Van Brakel - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1):59 - 70.
Escape from twin earth: Putnam's 'logic' of natural kind terms.Carleton B. Christensen - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (2):123-150.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-23

Downloads
47 (#297,414)

6 months
4 (#315,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Irene Olivero
Università degli Studi di Padova

References found in this work

In defense of proper functions.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
Realism and human kinds.Amie L. Thomasson - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):580–609.

View all 32 references / Add more references