Comments on American Philosophy: The Basics

Florida Philosophical Review 14 (1):56-63 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I provide some brief critiques concerning Nancy Stanlick’s recent work, American Philosophy: The Basics. While it should be considered an exceptional and inclusive study of American philosophy, I argue that Stanlick’s work suffers from too strong of an emphasis on the idea that American philosophy, and thus American philosophers, are wholly characterized by an emphasis on the practical.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nancy Stanlick's American Philosophy.Matthew Groe - 2014 - Florida Philosophical Review 14 (1):48-55.
American Philosophy: The Basics By Nancy Stanlick.Peter Olen - 2013 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49 (4):578.
A Response to Critics.Nancy Stanlick - 2014 - Florida Philosophical Review 14 (1):64-68.
Basics of Semiotics. [REVIEW]Robert S. Corrington - 1992 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 66 (1):99-102.
American Philosophy: A Historical Anthology.Barbara MacKinnon - 1985 - State University of New York Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-03

Downloads
3 (#1,514,380)

6 months
2 (#658,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

.Morris Silver - 2016 - 98 (1):184-202.

Add more references