What ought the historian of science know? A reply to Lynch

Social Epistemology 3 (4):367 – 372 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arguments in a Sartorial Mode, or the Asymmetries of History and Philosophy of Science.Robert J. Richards - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:482 - 489.
Reply to Harbers and de vries.William Lynch - 1993 - Social Epistemology 7 (2):209 – 211.
Reply to Lynch.Hans Harbers & Gerard de Vries - 1993 - Social Epistemology 7 (2):205 – 208.
Expressivism and the Value of Truth.Neil Sinclair - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (4):877-883.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
13 (#886,512)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Mismeasure of Man.Stephen Jay Gould - 1980 - W.W. Norton and Company.
Document, Text and Myth: Lavoisier's Crucial Year Revisited.C. E. Perrin - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (1):3-25.
Towards an Historiography of Science. [REVIEW]Nicholas Rescher - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):115-117.

Add more references