Problems with using stability, specificity, and proportionality as criteria for evaluating strength of scientific causal explanations: commentary on Lynch et al. (2019)

Biology and Philosophy 35 (1):26 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lynch et al. (Biol Philos 34:62, 2019) employ stability, specificity, and proportionality as criteria for evaluating microbiome causal explanations. Although these causal characteristics signify relevant differences between causal roles, I suggest that they should not be used as general criteria for strong or good causal explanations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-13

Downloads
19 (#778,470)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gry Oftedal
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Proportionality of single nucleotide causation.Gry Oftedal - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 93 (C):215-222.
The meaning of "cause" in genetics.Kate E. Lynch - 2021 - Combining Human Genetics and Causal Inference to Understand Human Disease and Development. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine.
Searching Probabilistic Difference-Making within Specificity.Andreas Lüchinger - 2021 - Kriterion – Journal of Philosophy 35 (3):217-235.

Add more citations