Epistemic Elitism, Paternalism, and Confucian Democracy

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (1):33-54 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper brings a fresh, epistemic perspective to bear on prominent Confucian philosophers’ arguments for a hybrid Deweyan-Confucian democracy, or for an illiberal democracy with “Confucian characteristics.” Reconstructing principles for epistemic elitism and paternalism from the pre-Qin 秦 Confucian thought that inspires these advocates for Confucian democracy, it finds two major problems with their proposals. For those who abandon or modify this epistemic elitism and paternalism in accordance with , the result is a philosophical syncretism that is either unconvincingly Confucian or unconvincingly Deweyan. For those who retain it in accordance with , the result is a democratic proposal that will lack legitimacy in increasingly pluralistic East Asian societies. In the end, there is a need for thinking that appropriately synthesizes Eastern and Western philosophies in a politically changing East Asia, but it would benefit from being less “Confucian.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democracy and Confucian values.Shaun O'Dwyer - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (1):39-63.
The Epistemic Circumstances of Democracy.Fabienne Peter - 2016 - In Miranda Fricker Michael Brady (ed.), The Epistemic Life of Groups. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 133 - 149.
Confucian Democracy and Equality.Ranjoo Seodu Herr - 2010 - Asian Philosophy 20 (3):261-282.
A Pluralist Reconstruction of Confucian Democracy.Sungmoon Kim - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):315-336.
Why Early Confucianism Cannot Generate Democracy.David Elstein - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):427-443.
The democratic potential of confucian minben thought.Viren Murthy - 2000 - Asian Philosophy 10 (1):33 – 47.
Confucius and mencius on the motivation to be moral.Yong Huang - 2010 - Philosophy East and West 60 (1):pp. 65-87.
Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Paternalism and democracy.Marion Smiley - 1989 - Journal of Value Inquiry 23 (4):299-318.
To Become a Confucian Democratic Citizen: Against Meritocratic Elitism.Sungmoon Kim - 2008 - British Journal of Political Science 43 (3):579-599.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-09

Downloads
45 (#311,164)

6 months
5 (#246,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?