Inference Rules in Nelson’s Logics, Admissibility and Weak Admissibility
Logica Universalis 9 (1):93-120 (2015)
Abstract
Our paper aims to investigate inference rules for Nelson’s logics and to discuss possible ways to determine admissibility of inference rules in such logics. We will use the technique offered originally for intuitionistic logic and paraconsistent minimal Johannson’s logic. However, the adaptation is not an easy and evident task since Nelson’s logics do not enjoy replacement of equivalences rule. Therefore we consider and compare standard admissibility and weak admissibility. Our paper founds algorithms for recognizing weak admissibility and admissibility itself – for restricted cases, to show the problems arising in the course of studyDOI
10.1007/s11787-014-0110-8
My notes
Similar books and articles
Criteria for admissibility of inference rules. Modal and intermediate logics with the branching property.Vladimir V. Rybakov - 1994 - Studia Logica 53 (2):203 - 225.
Discrete linear temporal logic with current time point clusters, deciding algorithms.V. Rybakov - 2008 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 17 (1-2):143-161.
Rules of inference with parameters for intuitionistic logic.Vladimir V. Rybakov - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):912-923.
The γ-admissibility of Relevant Modal Logics II — The Method using Metavaluations.Takahiro Seki - 2011 - Studia Logica 97 (3):351-383.
An Algebraic Proof of the Admissibility of γ in Relevant Modal Logics.Takahiro Seki - 2012 - Studia Logica 100 (6):1149-1174.
Intermediate Logics and Visser's Rules.Rosalie Iemhoff - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (1):65-81.
The γ-admissibility of Relevant Modal Logics I — The Method of Normal Models.Takahiro Seki - 2011 - Studia Logica 97 (2):199-231.
Best Unifiers in Transitive Modal Logics.Vladimir V. Rybakov - 2011 - Studia Logica 99 (1-3):321-336.
Admissibility of structural rules for contraction-free systems of intuitionistic logic.Roy Dyckhoff & Sara Negri - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1499-1518.
Logical equations and admissible rules of inference with parameters in modal provability logics.V. V. Rybakov - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (2):215 - 239.
Admissibility of Ackermann's rule δ in relevant logics.Gemma Robles - 2013 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 22 (4):411-427.
Book Review: V. V. Rybakov. Admissibility of Logical Inference Rules. [REVIEW]Marcus Kracht - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (4):578-587.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-01-04
Downloads
13 (#767,454)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2015-01-04
Downloads
13 (#767,454)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Constructible falsity and inexact predicates.Ahmad Almukdad & David Nelson - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):231-233.
Unification in intuitionistic logic.Silvio Ghilardi - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):859-880.
One hundred and two problems in mathematical logic.Harvey Friedman - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (2):113-129.
On the admissible rules of intuitionistic propositional logic.Rosalie Iemhoff - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):281-294.