Overcoming skepticism about molecular structure by developing the concept of affordance

Foundations of Chemistry 22 (1):77-86 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What chemists take as molecular structure is a theoretical construct based on the concepts of chemical bond, atoms in molecules, etc. and hence it should be distinguished from tangible structures around us. The practical adequacy of it has been demonstrated by the established method of retro-synthetic analysis, for instance. But it is not derived a priori from quantum mechanical treatments of the molecule and criticized for being irrelevant to the reality of the molecule. There is persistent skepticism about it. The present study aims to overcome this skepticism by having recourse to the concepts of affordance and phenomenal field. The basic idea of our approach is suggested by the following statement of Niels Bohr: ‘evidence obtained under different experimental conditions cannot be comprehended within a single picture but must be regarded as complementary in the sense that only the totality of the phenomena exhausts the possible information about the objects’. This implies that we should take account of a context in which the cognition of a fact arises when we think about human activities including science. This can be realized by invoking affordances of a complex such as {agent, devices, methods, substances, surroundings}. That is to say, affordances are context-relative dispositional attributes of {agent-material world} complexes as is asserted by Harré and Llored. The phenomenal field is a conceptual device which schematizes the contextual aspect of affordance and, more importantly, serves as a link between the concept of affordance and Kant’s theory of knowledge, by which alone affordances are realized as the dispositional properties of {agent-material world} complexes. Because affordances become actualized in various phenomenal fields, affordances of one and the same object may well be distinct from one another. In conclusion we can take that molecular structure is the affordance of a complex that includes a chemist who is engaged in organic synthesis, whereas a quantum mechanical picture of the molecule may be one of the possible affordances of a complex that includes a quantum chemist who cares about electronic states of the molecule.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does a molecule have structure?Hirofumi Ochiai - 2017 - Foundations of Chemistry 19 (3):197-207.
The concept of a structural affordance.Adrian Alsmith - 2012 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3 (2):94-107.
Extending the notion of affordance.Silvano Zipoli Caiani - 2014 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2):275-293.
Canonical affordances in context.Alan Costall - 2012 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3 (2):85-93.
Affordances explained.Andrea Scarantino - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):949-961.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-21

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophical grounds for designing invisible molecules.Hirofumi Ochiai - 2022 - Foundations of Chemistry 25 (1):141-149.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Realist Theory of Science.Roy Bhaskar - 1976 - Mind 85 (340):627-630.
The Private Science of Louis Pasteur.Gerald L. Geison - 1996 - Journal of the History of Biology 29 (2):322-325.

Add more references