Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):996-997 (2001)

Abstract
I argue that O'Regan & Noë's (O&N's) theory is in a no better position than any other theory to solve the “hard problem” of consciousness. Getting rid of the explanatory gap by exchanging sensorimotor contingencies for neural representations is an illusion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x01480113
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
38 ( #296,911 of 2,499,748 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,748 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes