Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):95-96 (2009)
Abstract |
Oaksford & Chater (O&C) subscribe to the view that a conditional expresses a high conditional probability of the consequent, given the antecedent, but they model conditionals as expressing a dependency between antecedent and consequent. Therefore, their model is inconsistent with their theoretical commitment. The model is also inconsistent with some findings on how people interpret conditionals and how they reason from them
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/S0140525X09000417 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
What Makes Us Believe a Conditional? The Roles of Covariation and Causality.Klaus Oberauer, Andrea Weidenfeld & Katrin Fischer - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):340 – 369.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Two and Three Stage Models of Deontic Reasoning.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (4):350 – 357.
Theories of Reasoning and the Computational Explanation of Everyday Inference.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (2):121 – 152.
Dual Processes, Probabilities, and Cognitive Architecture.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (1):15-26.
Deontic Reasoning, Modules and Innateness: A Second Look.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 1996 - Mind and Language 11 (2):191-202.
Cognition and Conditionals: Probability and Logic in Human Thought.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Logicism, Mental Models and Everyday Reasoning: Reply to Garnham.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 1993 - Mind and Language 8 (1):72-89.
Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):69-84.
Local and Global Inferential Relations: Response to Over (2009).Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 2009 - Thinking and Reasoning 15 (4):439-446.
Theories of Reasoning and the Representational Level: A Reply to Oaksford.Carlos Santamar - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (2):209 – 213.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-02-13
Total views
31 ( #365,834 of 2,498,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,153 )
2009-02-13
Total views
31 ( #365,834 of 2,498,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,153 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads