Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):95-96 (2009)

Oaksford & Chater (O&C) subscribe to the view that a conditional expresses a high conditional probability of the consequent, given the antecedent, but they model conditionals as expressing a dependency between antecedent and consequent. Therefore, their model is inconsistent with their theoretical commitment. The model is also inconsistent with some findings on how people interpret conditionals and how they reason from them
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X09000417
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #365,834 of 2,498,153 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,153 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes