Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):692-693 (2000)
| Abstract |
The hypothesis of two separate reasoning systems, one subserving individual goals and the other our genes, is theoretically implausible and not supported by the data. As an alternative, I propose a single system for analytical reasoning backed up by simple mechanisms for the selection of relevant information. This system can generate normative behavior as well as systematic deviations from it.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0140525x00513430 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems Reconstructed in Probability Semantics.Roger M. Cooke - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:409 - 421.
A Formula-Preferential Base for Paraconsistent and Plausible Reasoning Systems.Arnon Avron & Iddo Lev - 2001 - In Proceedings of the Workshop on Inconsistency in Data and Knowledge. pp. 60-70.
The IKBALS Project: Multi-Modal Reasoning in Legal Knowledge Based Systems. [REVIEW]John Zeleznikow, George Vossos & Daniel Hunter - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (3):169-203.
The Cognitive Agent: Overcoming Informational Limits.Orlin Vakarelov - 2011 - Adaptive Behavior 19 (2):83-100.
What Kind of Expert Should a System Be?Paul E. Johnson - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (1):77-97.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
22 ( #510,311 of 2,498,786 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,786 )
2009-01-28
Total views
22 ( #510,311 of 2,498,786 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,786 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
