What Are Poets For?

Philosophy Today 59 (1):37-60 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay is a renewal of Hölderlin’s poetic question as raised again philosophically by Heidegger, and is an attempt to frame the issue anew bringing Hegel into the conversation. At stake, first, is the way in which poetry and philosophy respectively—or perhaps in conjunction—are able to address the chief question of the time as a question of “truth.” What is it that poetry and the poet properly and uniquely do in relation to their time? Does the poet think, and how does she think poetically in language? And, crucially, how does poetic thinking differ from philosophical thinking? But at stake is also, second, the way in which philosophy can—and should—itself speak of poetry. Significantly, both Heidegger and Hegel propose a thoroughly new way of addressing the question of poetry in philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Poets Who Revise, Poets Who Don't, and Critics Who Should.Jack Stillinger - 1996 - The Journal of Aesthetic Education 30 (2):119.
Dekhā.Goutam Ghose (ed.) - 2004 - Angel Video.
Philosophers' poets.David Wood (ed.) - 1990 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-13

Downloads
52 (#299,806)

6 months
14 (#168,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Angelica Nuzzo
Brooklyn College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

When Poetry and Phenomenology Collide.Jeremy Page - 2018 - Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology 5 (1):31-51.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references