A Logical Hole the Chinese Room Avoids

Minds and Machines 21 (3):431-433 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Searle’s Chinese room argument (CRA) was recently charged as being unsound because it makes a logical error. It is shown here that this charge is based on a misinterpretation of the modal scope of a major premise of the CRA and that the CRA does not commit the logical error with which it is charged

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A logical hole in the chinese room.Michael John Shaffer - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (2):229-235.
Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room.Jason Ford - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (1):57-72.
The logic of Searle’s Chinese room argument.Robert I. Damper - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):163-183.
A note on the chinese room.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 1993 - Synthese 95 (2):169-72.
A cognitive analysis of the chinese room argument.Norman Y. Teng - 2000 - Philosophical Psychology 13 (3):313-24.
The chinese room is a trick.Peter Kugel - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):153-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-21

Downloads
154 (#118,801)

6 months
25 (#109,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The chinese room argument.David Cole - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A logical hole in the chinese room.Michael John Shaffer - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (2):229-235.

Add more references