A FALÁCIA NATURALISTA E A DERIVAÇÃO DE SEARLE

Perspectiva Filosófica 2 (49):133-147 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article we intend to characterize the issue of the so-called naturalistic fallacy and to evaluate how John Searle approaches it. To do this, we will briefly approach the arguments of David Hume and G. E. Moore and then analyze how Searle's objections to the alleged fallacy relate to such approaches and if have been successful.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Falácia Naturalista na Metaética Contemporânea: Usos e Equívocos.L. N. Igansi - 2014 - Fundamento 1 (8):11-31.
How to Derive “Ought” from “Is” Revisited.John R. Searle - 2021 - In Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi (eds.), Revisiting Searle on Deriving “Ought” From “Is”. Springer Verlag. pp. 3-16.
Searle’s Biological Naturalism and the Argument from Consciousness.James P. Moreland - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (1):68-91.
Institutional Facts and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Frank A. Hindriks - 2002 - ProtoSociology 16:170-192.
Teria a abordagem expressivista de normas de Gibbard cometido a falácia naturalista?Charles Feldhaus - 2011 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 10 (2):303-321.
The Naturalistic Fallacy and the History of Metaethics.Neil Sinclair - 2018 - In The Naturalistic Fallacy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
The trouble with Searle's biological naturalism.Kevin J. Corcoran - 2001 - Erkenntnis 55 (3):307-324.
Searle’s Biological Naturalism and the Argument from Consciousness.J. P. Moreland - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (1):68-91.
John R. Searle: Thinking about the Real World.Jan G. Michel, Dirk Franken & Attila Karakus (eds.) - 2010 - Frankfurt: ontos/de Gruyter.
Realism, biologism and 'the background'.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (2):149 – 166.
Making Social Worlds.Andrius Gališanka - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):115-133.
Las concepciones aristotélicas de la vida buena y la falacia naturalista [Aristotelian Conceptions of the Good Life and the Naturalistic Fallacy].Rocío Cázares Blanco - 2010 - Dianoia 55 (65):67-90.
The give and take of biological naturalism: John Searle and the case for dualism.Charles Taliaferro - 2005 - Philosophia Christi 7 (2):447-462.
A typology.Biological Naturalism Searle’S. - 2010 - In Jan G. Michel, Dirk Franken & Attila Karakus (eds.), John R. Searle: Thinking About the Real World. Ontos. pp. 73.
A Note on Searle's Naturalistic Fallacy Fallacy.James C. Anderson - 1974 - Analysis 34 (4):139 - 141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-04

Downloads
153 (#120,620)

6 months
58 (#73,829)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Pires Nunes
Universidade de Caxias Do Sul

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How to Derive Ought from Is.John Searle - 1964 - In James Rachels (ed.), Ethical Theory 1: The Question of Objectivity. Oxford University Press.
Realism, Naturalism, and Moral Semantics.David O. Brink - 2001 - Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (2):154.
Some Questions concerning Validity.J. O. Urmson - 1953 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 7 (3):217.

Add more references