Special Relativity as a Step in the Development of the Quantum Programme: Revolution in a Revolution

Centaurus 29 (2):100-109 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To make out in what way Einstein’s 1905 ‘annus mirabilis’ writings hang together one has to hang on Einstein’s strive for unity evinced in his stubborn attempts to coordinate with one another the basic research traditions of classical physics. Light quanta hypothesis and special theory of relativity turn out to be mere milestones of maxwellian electrodynamics and statistical thermodynamics reconciliation programme. The conception of luminiferous ether was an insurmountable stumbling block for Einstein’s statistical thermodynamics programme in which the leading role was played by the light quanta paper .

Similar books and articles

Einstein's Revolution: Reconciliation of Mechanics, Electrodynamics and Thermodynamics.Rinat M. Nugayev - 2000 - Physis.Rivista Internazionale Di Storia Della Scienza (1):181-207.
Why did the new physics force out the old?Rinat M. Nugayev - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):127 – 140.
The General Relativity Genesis: an Intertheoretic Context.Rinat M. Nugayev - 2017 - Voprosi Filosofii (The Problems of Philosophy) (1):62-70.
Are probabilism and special relativity compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Technological Origins of the Einsteinian Revolution.Donald Gillies - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (2):97-126.
The Cognitive Revolution?John L. Casti - 1993 - Idealistic Studies 23 (1):19-38.
The Quantum Revolution in Philosophy.Richard Healey - 2017 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-13

Downloads
311 (#61,488)

6 months
99 (#37,957)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rinat M. Nugayev
Moscow State University

Citations of this work

Book review. [REVIEW]Yuri V. Balashov - 1993 - Erkenntnis 38 (3):429-432.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
On lorentz's methodology.Arthur I. Miller - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):29-45.

View all 6 references / Add more references