Final Reply to Professor Schweickart

Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):335 (1987)


Since Schweickart asserts that I have not addressed his main argument, let me consider briefly the four claims he advances at the beginning of his second reply. Regarding 1: To argue, as I have, that there would be a strong tendency for market socialism to degenerate into capitalism, it is necessary to spell out carefully what capitalism is. Following Marx, I defined capitalism as a system in which the workers do not control the means of production and the workers sell their labor power as a commodity. As G.A. Cohen has pointed out, this definition can be given a rechtsfrei characterization in terms of effective powers over means of production and labor power. Actual legal arrangements are not the issue. In my original paper, I never said that the workers would sell the means of production. Thus 1 is irrelevant. The real questions are: Who effectively controls the means of production? Who effectively gets the profits? If the answer to both of these questions is, “Not the workers,” it follows that the workers are effectively proletarians and the system is a form of capitalism

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,722

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

24 (#478,650)

6 months
1 (#387,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Public Choice.Dennis C. Mueller - 1982 - Ethics 92 (3):560-561.
A Reply to Arnold's Reply.David Schweickart - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):331.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Reply to Arnold's Reply.David Schweickart - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):331.
I. Mathematical Modeling of Election Predictions: Final Reply to Professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
Reply to Professor Nell.N. Scott Arnold - 1987 - Ethics 97 (2):411-413.
Reply to Professor Putterman.N. Scott Arnold - 1988 - Economics and Philosophy 4 (2):337.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
A Reply to Professor Schweickart.Robert Paul Wolff - 1984 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (3):369 - 374.