The Complicated History of Einfühlung

Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 1 (2):301-326 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article analyses the history of the Einfühlung concept. Theories of ‘feeling into’ Nature, works of art or feelings and behaviours of other persons by German philosophers of the second half of the nineteenth century Robert and Friedrich Vischer and Theodor Lipps are evoked, as well as similar theory of understanding (Verstehen) by Wilhelm Dilthey and Friedrich Schleiermacher, to which Dilthey refers. The meaning of the term Einfühlung within Edith Stein’s thought is also analysed. Both Einfühlung and Verstehen were criticized as non-objective and naive methods consisting only in the identification of the subject with the object or the projection of feelings onto the object. The article refers to criticism by Georg Gadamer and Bertolt Brecht and proposes ways to restitute the concept of Einfühlung after this criticism, recalling the theory of empathy by Dominick Lacapra, in terms of its advantages for the historical enquiry, or the myth of Narcissus analyzed in the spirit of psychoanalysis by Julia Kristeva. The article proposes a reformulation of the concept of mimesis, connected to the Einfühlung, understood as the identification, analogy, imitation of feelings (as it was described by Lipss and Vischer). Mimesis does not necessarily mean a passive repetition and reconstruction of the feelings of the object, but serves only as a starting point for the interest of the subject for the outside world or for experiences of historical protagonists. Then there is no identification or projection of feelings, but the creative, active and critical reformulation of knowledge. It is stated that empathy is not a passive, uncritical process, but that it deals with the critical choice of the object of empathy and with an active approach to the perceived feelings and appearances. In addition to this cognitive aspect, empathy may also contribute to the analytical and valuable introspection. Furthermore empathy allows us to connect the analysis of the facts with a personal narrative and understanding of individual identity in historical knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empathy, Rationality, and Explanation.Mark Bevir & Karsten Stueber - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):147-162.
A Just Medium: Empathy and Detachment in Historical Understanding.Constantine Sandis - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):179-200.
Simulation, projection and empathy.Dan Zahavi - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (2):514-522.
Depth psychology, death and the hermeneutic of empathy.George B. Hogenson - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (1):67-90.
Historical Empathy in the Social Studies Classroom.Sarah Brooks - 2009 - Journal of Social Studies Research 33 (2):213-234.
A Remedy called Empathy: The Neglected Element of Human Rights Theory.Frederik von Harbou - 2013 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 99 (2):133-151.
Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz.Dan Zahavi - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):285-306.
Active Mimesis and the Art of History of Philosophy.Robert Piercey - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):29-42.
Empathy.Karsten Stueber - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-12

Downloads
2,900 (#2,434)

6 months
113 (#31,750)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The idea of history.Robin George Collingwood - 1961 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by der Dussen & J. W..
Tales of Love.Julia Kristeva - 1987 - Columbia University Press.
The Idea of History.Arthur E. Murphy - 1947 - Philosophical Review 56 (5):587.
.Marc Forster - unknown

View all 7 references / Add more references