Should Parental Refusal of Puberty-Blocking Treatment be Overridden? The Role of the Harm Principle

American Journal of Bioethics 19 (2):69-72 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,890

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

False belief and the refusal of medical treatment.R. Faden & A. Faden - 1977 - Journal of Medical Ethics 3 (3):133-136.
The moral foundation of the precautionary principle.Karsten Klint Jensen - 2002 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):39-55.
Consent, competency and ECT: some critical suggestions.R. Sherlock - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (3):141-143.
Qué hijos tener. Libertad procreativa, autonomía parental y principio del daño.Blanca Rodríguez López - 2011 - Telos: Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 18 (1):127-151.
The harm principle.Nils Holtug - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.


Added to PP

23 (#531,184)

6 months
1 (#503,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?