Classical Quarterly 12 (3-4):141- (1918)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Georg. I. 36 sq.:quidquid eris,—nam te nec sperant Tartara regem, nec tibi regnandi ueniat tam dira cupido;—Mr. Page's note puts well what seems the customary view of this famous parenthesis: ‘The force of nam deserves attention. Having used the phrase quidquid eris, which sums up the whole passage from line 24, as though there were no other form of deity left which Augustus could assume, Vergil adds this explanatory sentence to show why he had not mentioned the fourth division into which deities were divided, viz. those of the underworld. The fourfold division of deities being well known, Vergil cannot omit the fourth without stating the reason for which he does so.’



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vollmer's Appendix Vergiliana.H. W. Garrod - 1911 - The Classical Review 25 (06):180-182.
Ueber die Appendix Vergiliana. By Max Sonntag.Robinson Ellis - 1887 - The Classical Review 1 (10):306-307.
Version.Gilbert Norwood - 1924 - The Classical Review 38 (5-6):97-.
A Greek Inscription from Gallipoli.Gilbert Norwood - 1917 - Classical Quarterly 11 (01):1-.


Added to PP

23 (#501,637)

6 months
1 (#448,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references