The impossible process: Thermodynamic reversibility

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 55:43-61 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Standard descriptions of thermodynamically reversible processes attribute contradictory properties to them: they are in equilibrium yet still change their state. Or they are comprised of non-equilibrium states that are so close to equilibrium that the difference does not matter. One cannot have states that both change and no not change at the same time. In place of this internally contradictory characterization, the term “thermodynamically reversible process” is here construed as a label for a set of real processes of change involving only non-equilibrium states. The properties usually attributed to a thermodynamically reversible process are recovered as the limiting properties of this set. No single process, that is, no system undergoing change, equilibrium or otherwise, carries those limiting properties. The paper concludes with an historical survey of characterizations of thermodynamically reversible processes and a critical analysis of their shortcomings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Meta-Reversibility Objection.Meacham Christopher - 2023 - In Barry Loewer, Brad Weslake & Eric B. Winsberg (eds.), The Probability Map of the Universe: Essays on David Albert’s _time and Chance_. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
The (absence of a) relationship between thermodynamic and logical reversibility.O. J. E. Maroney - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):355-374.
The relationship between thermodynamic and logical reversibility.O. J. E. Maroney - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):355-374.
Is there a reversibility paradox? Recentering the debate on the thermodynamic time arrow.Alon Drory - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (4):889-913.
Is there a reversibility paradox? Recentering the debate on the thermodynamic time arrow.Alon Drory - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (4):889-913.
Relativistic transformations of thermodynamic quantities.Noam Agmon - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (5-6):331-339.
The enigma of reversibility and the genesis of sense in Merleau-ponty.David Morris - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (2):141-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-06

Downloads
35 (#445,257)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John D. Norton
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

In Search of the Holy Grail: How to Reduce the Second Law of Thermodynamics.Katie Robertson - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (4):987-1020.
Understanding Physics: ‘What?’, ‘Why?’, and ‘How?’.Mario Hubert - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-36.
Infinite idealizations in physics.Elay Shech - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (9):e12514.
Reversing the arrow of time.Bryan W. Roberts - 2022 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics.Jos Uffink - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (3):305-394.
Rational Thermodynamics.C. Truesdell - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (2):305-306.
Infinite Idealizations.John D. Norton - 2012 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 17:197-210.

View all 15 references / Add more references