The Irrational Game: why there’s no perfect system

In Eric Bronson (ed.), Poker and Philosophy. Open Court. pp. 105-115 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a chapter written for a popular audience, in which I use poker as a convenient illustration of probability, determinism and counterfactuals. More originally, I also discuss the roles of rationality versus psychological hunches, and explain why even in principle game theory cannot provide us the panacea of a perfect winning srategy. (N.B. The document I have uploaded here is slightly longer than the abbreviated version that appears in the book, and also differs in a few other minor details.)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Multistage Game Models and Delay Supergames.Reinhard Selten - 1998 - Theory and Decision 44 (1):1-36.
Evolutionary game theory, morality, and Darwinism.Gary Mar - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):1-2.
Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction.Ken Binmore - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Classical versus evolutionary game theory.Herbert Gintis - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):1-2.
Variations on a game of Gale (I): Coding strategies.Marion Scheepers - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (3):1035-1043.
Evolutionary games without rationality?Martin Bunzl - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (3):365-378.
Game-theoretic axioms for local rationality and bounded knowledge.Gian Aldo Antonelli & Cristina Bicchieri - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (2):145-167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-13

Downloads
380 (#50,606)

6 months
82 (#51,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Northcott
Birkbeck College, London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references