The evolution of religious misbelief

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):531 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Inducing religious thoughts increases prosocial behavior among strangers in anonymous contexts. These effects can be explained both by behavioral priming processes as well as by reputational mechanisms. We examine whether belief in moralizing supernatural agents supplies a case for what McKay & Dennett (M&D) call evolved misbelief, concluding that they might be more persuasively seen as an example of culturally evolved misbelief



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The evolution of misbelief.Ryan McKay & Daniel Dennett - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):493.
A continuum of mindfulness.Daniel Dennett & Ryan McKay - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):353-354.
Evolution, providence, and Gouldian contingency.Michael Rota - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (4):393-412.
It is likely misbelief never has a function.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):529-530.
Misbelief and the neglect of environmental context.David Dunning - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):517-518.


Added to PP

35 (#336,103)

6 months
1 (#451,971)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles