Ethics and History: Can Critical Lawyers Talk of Good and Evil? [Book Review]

Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (3):443-456 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay explores what we might mean by good and evil, and argues that these terms remain salient for a critical, socio-historical, understanding of criminal law. It draws upon a meta-ethics of freedom and solidarity to explain what good means in recent mercy killing cases in England and Wales, and what evil means in Arendt’s phrase, the ‘banality of evil’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A philosophy of evil.Lars Fr H. Svendsen - 2010 - Champaign, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.
Is All Evil Really Only Privation?John F. Crosby - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:197-209.
This side of evil.Michael Gelven - 1998 - Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University Press.
Is radical evil banal? Is banal evil radical?Paul Formosa - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):717-735.
Natural evil.Richard Swinburne - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (4):295 - 301.
On Evils, Evil, Radical Evil and the Demonic.Agnes Heller - 2011 - Critical Horizons 12 (1):15-27.
Freedom and Evil.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), What Philosophers Think. A&C Black.
On evil.Adam Morton - 2004 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-14

Downloads
43 (#352,595)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references