Doubt in Wittgenstein’s “Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough”

Wittgenstein-Studien 6 (1):1-18 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/witt-2015-0103

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On Wittgenstein's Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough for Jacques Bouveresse.David Sachs - 1988 - Philosophical Investigations 11 (2):147-150.
Wittgenstein, Frazer, and religion.Brian R. Clack - 1999 - New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press.
Wittgenstein on Vaihinger and Frazer.Carlos Alves Pereira - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (1):145-165.
Hypotheses, Criterial Claims, and Perspicuous Representations: Wittgenstein's 'Remarks on Frazer's The Golden Bough'.Richard Eldridge - 1987 - Philosophical Investigations 10 (3):226-245.
Understanding the Fire-Festivals: Wittgenstein and Theories in Religion1: RICHARD H. BELL.Richard H. Bell - 1978 - Religious Studies 14 (1):113-124.
Wittgenstein on Frazer's Golden Bough.Costis M. Coveos - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (254):518 - 521.
The Golden Bough The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. Abridged edition. By Sir J. G. Frazer. One vol. 8vo. Pp. xvi + 756, with Frontispiece. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1922. 18s. net. [REVIEW]R. R. Marett - 1923 - The Classical Review 37 (3-4):83-84.
Anthropology as ritual: Wittgenstein's reading of Frazer's the golden bough.Paul Redding - 1987 - Metaphilosophy 18 (3-4):253-269.
Developmental Hypotheses and Perspicuous Representations: Wittgenstein on Frazer's Golden Bough.P. M. S. Hacker - 1992 - Iyyun 41:277-299.
Poznámky o Frazerově „Zlaté ratolesti“.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 2006 - Filosoficky Casopis 54:561-576.
2. Wittgensteins erste Auseinandersetzung mit Frazers Golden Bough.Marco Brusotti - 2014 - In Wittgenstein, Frazer Und Die Ethnologische Betrachtungsweise. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 62-273.
Anhang: Wittgensteins Auseinandersetzung mit Frazers Golden Bough im Kontext des Nachlasses.Marco Brusotti - 2014 - In Wittgenstein, Frazer Und Die Ethnologische Betrachtungsweise. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 398-405.
4. Die spätere Auseinandersetzung mit dem Golden Bough: Die losen Blätter in der Abridged Edition.Marco Brusotti - 2014 - In Wittgenstein, Frazer Und Die Ethnologische Betrachtungsweise. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 305-331.
A Critical Note on the Editions of Wittgenstein's Remarks on Frazer´ s Golden Bough.Andrzej Orzechowski - 1995 - Wittgenstein-Studien 2 (2).
Schrödinger's Cat & the Golden Bough: Reflections on Science, Mythology, and Magic.Randy Bancroft - 2000 - Upa.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-07

Downloads
43 (#362,182)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Cavell's inheritance of Luther.Andrew Norris - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):1062-1076.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references