Ditching determination and dependence: or, how to wear the crazy trousersa

Synthese 198 (1):395-418 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper defends Flatland—the view that there exist neither determination nor dependence relations, and that everything is therefore fundamental—from the objection from explanatory inefficacy. According to that objection, Flatland is unattractive because it is unable to explain either the appearance as of there being determination relations, or the appearance as of there being dependence relations. We show how the Flatlander can meet the first challenge by offering four strategies—reducing, eliminating, untangling and omnizing—which, jointly, explain the appearance as of determination relations where no such relations obtain. Since, plausibly, dependence relations just are asymmetric determination relations, we argue that once we come mistakenly to believe that there exist determination relations, the existence of other asymmetries (conceptual and temporal) explains why it appears that there are dependence relations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Supervenience, determination, and dependence.Jeffrey Yoshimi - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):114–133.
Respects of Dependence.Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2019 - Studia Neoaristotelica 16 (1):49-82.
The Deflationary Theory of Ontological Dependence.David Mark Kovacs - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272):481-502.
Physicalism without supervenience.Lei Zhong - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (5):1529-1544.
A Finite Axiomatization of G-Dependence.Gianluca Paolini - 2017 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 26 (3):293-302.
Entrenchment versus dependence: Coherence and foundations in belief change.Alexander Bochman - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (1):3-27.
Ontological dependence.Fabrice Correia - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1013-1032.
Viewing-as explanations and ontic dependence.William D’Alessandro - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (3):769-792.
What is priority monism?David Mark Kovacs - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (9):2873-2893.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-23

Downloads
35 (#441,839)

6 months
9 (#288,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

James Norton
University of Tasmania
Kristie Miller
University of Sydney
Michael J. Duncan
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

Varieties of Grounding Skepticism.David Mark Kovacs - 2023 - The Monist 106 (3):301-316.
Social kinds are essentially mind-dependent.Rebecca Mason - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (12):3975-3994.
Ideological innocence.Daniel Rubio - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
On what grounds what.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.

View all 82 references / Add more references