Bankers Bashing Back: Amoral CSR Justifications

Journal of Business Ethics 147 (2):401-418 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The finance industry is required to respond to public criticism of perceived immoral behaviour. To create legitimacy, financial firms not only undertake corporate social responsibility activities, but also support such activities with precise justifications. In this paper, we study CSR justifications appearing in annual and sustainability reports from the Swedish finance industry. Our objective is to investigate the ethical character of CSR justifications in the finance industry. This is an interesting topic, both because CSR carries ethical meaning and because CSR justifications play a role in actual business activities. A secondary aim of this article is to test whether decoupled corporate claims about CSR can be recoupled, which would potentially help companies to act responsibly. The observed CSR justifications avoided the fundamental question of whether the finance industry does in fact have responsibilities, and they did not manifest awareness of stakeholders’ demands for CSR. Seemingly value-based CSR activities often lacked ethical justifications. These characteristics do not harmonize with the responsible image that the contemporary finance industry wants to portray. Our counterintuitive finding is that amorality prevails in the justifications that banks give for undertaking CSR activities.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,980

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why pragmatic justifications of epistemic norms don't work.V. Mitova - 2008 - South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):139-150.
Excuses, excuses.Marcia Baron - 2007 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21-39.
When Bankers Rule.Peter Maurin - 2008 - The Chesterton Review 34 (3/4):775-775.
Doctor bashing-reply.J. Howell - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (1):44-44.
Doctor Bashing?James D. Gagnon - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (1):44-44.
Facing the Consequences.Nathan Hanna - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (3):589-604.
Punishing 'Dirty Hands'—Three Justifications.Stephen Wijze - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (4):879-897.
Philosophy Bashing, Its Causes and Cures.Nancy J. Holland - 1987 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 61 (2):387 - 389.
Realism, morality, and liberal democracy.Peter Digeser & Ross Howard Miller - 1995 - Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (3):331-349.
A Reply To Leavitt's Commentary - Let's Stop Bashing Japan.Takashi Tsuchiya - 2003 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 13 (5):167-168.


Added to PP

13 (#805,564)

6 months
1 (#509,414)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Sein und Zeit.Martin Heidegger (ed.) - 1935 - Halle a.: d. S., M. Niemeyer.
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory.R. Edward Freeman - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):409-421.
The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification.Michael Power - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (1):92-94.

View all 26 references / Add more references