Biology and Philosophy: The Methodological Foundations of Biometry

Journal of the History of Biology 8 (1):85 - 93 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00129596

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Evolution by the Numbers: The Origins of Mathematical Argument in Biology.James Wynn - 2011 - Parlor Press.
‘‘Describing our whole experience’’: The statistical philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson.Charles H. Pence - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):475-485.
Debates in Philosophy of Biology: One Long Argument, or Many?Catherine Kendig - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):73 - 81.
Science as a way of knowing: the foundations of modern biology.John Alexander Moore - 1993 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Methodological problems in evolutionary biology VI. the force of evolutionary epistemology.Wim J. Steen - 1986 - Acta Biotheoretica 35 (3).
Systems Biology: Philosophical Foundations.Fred C. Boogerd, Frank J. Bruggeman, Jan-Hendrik S. Hofmeyr & Hans V. Westerhoff (eds.) - 2007 - Boston: Elsevier.
The epistemology of development, evolution, and genetics: selected essays.Richard M. Burian - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Biometry.Frank E. Lutz - 1905 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (1):12-16.
The Statistical Frame of Mind in Systematic Biology from Quantitative Zoology to Biometry.Joel Hagen - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 36 (2):353-384.
Reductionism in a historical science.Alex Rosenberg - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (2):135-163.
Two concepts of constraint: Adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology.Ron Amundson - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (4):556-578.
Ins and outs of systems biology vis-à-vis molecular biology: Continuation or clear cut?Philippe De Backer, Danny De Waele & Linda Van Speybroeck - 2009 - Acta Biotheoretica 58 (1):15-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Beyond Mendelism and Biometry.Yafeng Shan - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):155-163.
Modelling populations: Pearson and Fisher on mendelism and biometry.Margaret Morrison - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):39-68.
The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric—Mendelian Debate.Robert Olby - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (3):299-320.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references