A flawed argument for perdurance – reply to braddon-Mitchell and Miller

Analysis 65 (2):164-166 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00544.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the conditional analysis of phenomenal concepts.Torin Alter - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 134 (2):235 - 253.
The real but dead past: A reply to braddon-Mitchell.Peter Forrest - 2004 - Analysis 64 (4):358–362.
Could we experience the passage of time?Simon Prosser - 2007 - Ratio 20 (1):75-90.
Pegs, boards, and relativistic perdurance.Yuri Balashov - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):167-175.
The Philosophy of Mind and Cognition: An Introduction.David Braddon-Mitchell & Frank Jackson - 1996 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Frank Jackson.
How do we know it is now now?David Braddon-Mitchell - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):199–203.
On the conditional analysis of phenomenal concepts.Torin Alter - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (3):777-778.
A flawed argument for perdurance.Harold Noonan - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):213-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
104 (#162,687)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Harold Noonan
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical papers.David Kellogg Lewis - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A flawed argument for perdurance.Harold Noonan - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):213-215.

Add more references