A coherentist response to Stoneham's reductio

Analysis 67 (3):267–268 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/67.3.267

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reductio ad absurdum.Nicholas Rescher - 2002 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A case of confusing probability and confirmation.Jeanne Peijnenburg - 2012 - Synthese 184 (1):101-107.
A reductio of coherentism.Tom Stoneham - 2007 - Analysis 67 (3):254–257.
Can A Coherentist Be An Externalist?William A. Roche - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):269-280.
Berkeley's world: an examination of the Three dialogues.Tom Stoneham - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Surprise Exam Paradox: Disentangling Two Reductios.John N. Williams - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:67-94.
The Surprise Exam Paradox.John N. Williams - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:67-94.
One naturalized epistemological argument against coherentist accounts of empirical knowledge.David K. Henderson - 1995 - Erkenntnis 43 (2):199 - 227.
Coherentist contraction.SvenOve Hansson - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):315-330.
Skepticism About the Past and the Problem of the Criterion.Bryson Brown - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):291-306.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#273,414)

6 months
4 (#573,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Noordhof
University of York

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

A reductio of coherentism.Tom Stoneham - 2007 - Analysis 67 (3):254–257.
How not to state T-sentences.Volker Halbach - 2006 - Analysis 66 (4):276-280.

Add more references