To Give or to Receive? The Role of Giver Versus Receiver on Object Tracking and Object Preferences in Children and Adults

Journal of Cognition and Culture 21 (5):369-388 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For adults, ownership is a concept that rests on principles and connections that apply broadly – whether the owner is the self or someone else, and whether the self is giver or receiver. The present studies tested whether preschool children likewise treat ownership in this abstract fashion. In Experiment 1, 20 children and 24 adults were assigned to be either “givers” or “receivers.” They were then asked to identify which items they and the researcher owned. In Experiment 2, 20 children and 24 adults were asked which items they and the experimenter liked best. In both experiments, participants’ judgments were not influenced by their role, but were more adult-like when reasoning about self-owned than other-owned objects. These data suggest that intuitions about property ownership are initially egocentric – biased toward linking objects to one’s self – and then extend to others over the course of development.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contextualism about object-seeing.Ben Phillips - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (9):2377-2396.
What Do Object Files Pick Out?Edwin Green - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (2):177-200.
Multiple object tracking in infants: Four (or so) ways of being discrete.M. L. Chen & A. M. Leslie - 2009 - In Bruce M. Hood & Laurie Santos (eds.), The Origins of Object Knowledge. Oxford University Press. pp. 85--106.
Do We See Facts?Alfredo Vernazzani - 2020 - Mind and Language (4):674-693.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-17

Downloads
6 (#1,353,689)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susan Gelman
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references