Lewis's Philosophical Method

In B. Loewer & J. Schaffer (eds.), A Companion to Lewis. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 25-39 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lewis is famous as a contemporary philosophical system-builder. The most obvious way his philosophy exhibited a system was in its content: Lewis’s metaphysics, for example, provided answers to many metaphysical puzzles in an integrated way, and there are illuminating connections to be drawn between his general metaphysical views and, for example, his various views about the mind and its place in nature

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lewis' strawman.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):55-65.
Can we know the contents of C I Lewis's mind?Vincent Tomas - 1950 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 11 (June):541-548.
How to be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism.John Greco - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.
The failure of Lewis's functionalism.Joseph Owens - 1982 - Philosophical Quarterly 32 (April):159-73.
Lewisian themes: the philosophy of David K. Lewis.Frank Jackson & Graham Priest (eds.) - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A defense of local miracle compatibilism.Peter A. Graham - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (1):65 - 82.
Peirce’s Summum Bonum and the Ethical Views of C. I. Lewis and John Dewey.Morton White - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1029-1037.
Lehrer and the consequence argument.Danilo Šuster - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (1):77-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-11

Downloads
781 (#19,062)

6 months
275 (#7,753)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Nolan
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Ontological Innocence.Katherine Hawley - 2014 - In A. J. Cotnoir & Donald L. M. Baxter (eds.), Composition as Identity. Oxford University Press. pp. 70-89.
Resisting the epistemic argument for compatibilism.Patrick Todd & Brian Rabern - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (5):1743-1767.
Metaphysical Modality, without Possible Worlds.Giorgio Lando - 2022 - In Francesco Ademollo, Fabrizio Amerini & Vincenzo De Risi (eds.), Thinking and Calculating. Cham: Springer. pp. 385-408.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1965 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The moral problem.Michael Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.

View all 31 references / Add more references