Liberalism and the Two Directions of the Local Food Movement

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (2):211-224 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The local food movement is, increasingly, becoming a part of the modern American landscape. However, while it appears that the local food movement is gaining momentum, one could question whether or not this trend is, in fact, politically and socially sustainable. Is local food just another trend that will fade away or is it here to stay? One way to begin addressing this question is to ascertain whether or not it is compatible with liberalism, a set of influential political theories that have shaped and continue to shape our political system. In this paper, I argue that the local food movement is partially compatible with forms of liberalism that accept the limited application of the principle of neutrality, as there are two directions or trends within local food: (1) The systems based direction and (2) the individual focused direction. The systems based direction is not compatible while the individual focused movement is largely compatible with liberalism. I go on to argue that the two directions form a dialectic that increases the political and social sustainability of the movement as a whole. Conceiving of the individual focused and the systems focused directions as in opposition to one another is, itself, a mistake

Similar books and articles

From Food Justice to a Tool of the Status Quo: Three Sub-movements Within Local Food.Ian Werkheiser & Samantha Noll - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (2):201-210.
Of bodies, place, and culture: Re-situating local food. [REVIEW]Laura B. Delind - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (2):121-146.
Locating Ecofeminism in Encounters with Food and Place.Chaone Mallory - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):171-189.
Choosing a food future: Differentiating among alternative food options. [REVIEW]Jeffrey R. Follett - 2009 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (1):31-51.
Biotechnology is not compatible with sustainable agriculture.Martha L. Crouch - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):98-111.
Ethical Consumption, Values Convergence/Divergence and Community Development.Michael A. Long & Douglas L. Murray - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):351-375.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-17

Downloads
266 (#72,398)

6 months
90 (#44,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samantha Noll
Washington State University

Citations of this work

Eating Local: A philosophical toolbox.Andrea Borghini, Nicola Piras & Beatrice Serini - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 72 (3):527-551.
Growing knowledge: Epistemic objects in agricultural extension work.Julia R. S. Bursten & Catherine Kendig - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 88 (C):85-91.
History Lessons: What Urban Environmental Ethics Can Learn from Nineteenth Century Cities.Samantha Noll - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (1):143-159.

Add more citations

References found in this work

After virtue: a study in moral theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1981 - Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Justice as fairness: a restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.Michael J. Sandel - 1982 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Samuel Scheffler - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (3):443.

View all 34 references / Add more references