Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):647-648 (1998)

Abstract
The dynamical hypothesis is strong in that, for it to be true, every cognitive phenomenon must be best modeled by a dynamical system. Depending on how it is interpreted, however, the hypothesis may be seen as probably false or even unfalsifiable. Strengthening the hypothesis to require unification, or at least coherence, across models in different cognitive domains alleviates this problem.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x98441736
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Disentangling Dynamics, Computation, and Cognition.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):654-661.
What is the Dynamical Hypothesis?Nick Chater & Ulrike Hahn - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):633-634.
The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):615-28.
The Dynamical Hypothesis: One Battle Behind.Robert M. French & Elizabeth Thomas - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):640-641.
What Might Dynamical Intentionality Be, If Not Computation?Ronald L. Chrisley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):634-635.
Dynamical Modeling and Morphological Analysis.Jean Petitot - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):649-649.
Why Dynamical Implementation Matters.James W. Garson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):641-642.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
44 ( #257,147 of 2,506,408 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,997 of 2,506,408 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes