Création et providence divine chez Plotin

Chôra 13:103-124 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that Plotinus denies deliberative forethought about the physical cosmos to the demiurge on the basis of certain basic and widely shared Platonic and Aristotelian assumptions about the character of divine thought. We then discuss how Plotinus can nonetheless maintain that the cosmos is «providentially» ordered. [Note: This paper is a French translation (prepared by Mathilde Brémond) of a paper that appears in A. Marmodoro and B. Prince (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity (Cambridge, 2015).]

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,053

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Creation and Divine Providence in Plotinus.Christopher Noble & Nathan Powers - 2015 - In Anna Marmodoro & Brian D. Prince (eds.), Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 51-70.
Providence and Fate in Plotinus.Christopher Noble - 1996 - In Lloyd P. Gerson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 386-409.
Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity.Anna Marmodoro & Brian D. Prince (eds.) - 2015 - Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Der Kosmos als schweigender Prophet: Zu Plotin, Enn. II 9 [33],9,39–42.Felix Herkert - 2020 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 41 (2):363-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-14

Downloads
35 (#623,135)

6 months
9 (#429,548)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Nathan Powers
State University of New York, Albany
Christopher Noble
Syracuse University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references