Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (3):831-852 (2018)

Authors
Abstract
In February 2012, the Obama White House endorsed a Privacy Bill of Rights, comprising seven principles. The third, “Respect for Context,” is explained as the expectation that “companies will collect, use, and disclose personal data in ways that are consistent with the context in which consumers provide the data.” One can anticipate the contested interpretations of this principle as parties representing diverse interests vie to make theirs the authoritative one. In the paper I will discuss three possibilities and explain why each does not take us far beyond the status quo, which, regulators in the United States, Europe, and beyond have found problematic. I will argue that contextual integrity offers the best way forward for protecting privacy in a world where information increasingly mediates our significant activities and relationships. Although an important goal is to influence policy, this paper aims less to stipulate explicit rules than to present an underlying justificatory, or normative rationale. Along the way, it will review key ideas in the theory of contextual integrity, its differences from existing approaches, and its harmony with basic intuition about information sharing practices and norms.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-015-9674-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Privacy and Occupational Health Services.A. Heikkinen - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):522-525.
The Right to Privacy.Lloyd L. Weinreb - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):25.
Privacy and the Public/Private Dichotomy.Simon Dawes - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 107 (1):115-124.
Security and Privacy: Why Privacy Matters. [REVIEW]Stephanie J. Bird - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):669-671.
Privacy and Social Interaction.Beate Roessler & Dorota Mokrosinska - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):771-791.
Privacy as Informational Commodity.Jarek Gryz - 2013 - Proceedings of IACAP Conference.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-03

Total views
53 ( #216,137 of 2,520,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,509 of 2,520,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes