The Observer's Involvement – One of the Restrictions of Science

Filozofska Istrazivanja 30 (1-2):175-191 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anima — Is Its Involvement Necessary in Physical Processes?Jerzy A. Janik - 2007 - Dialogue and Universalism 17 (12):31-35.
Nanoethics in a Nanolab: Ethics via Participation. [REVIEW]Julio R. Tuma - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):983-1005.
The information processing organisms.Lydia Arianova - 1996 - Acta Biotheoretica 44 (2):143-151.
A Coaccelerated Observer.Amos Harpaz & Noam Soker - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (9):1521-1531.
Ex‐offender Restrictions.Zachary Hoskins - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (1):33-48.
Gun control.Hugh LaFollette - 2000 - Ethics 110 (2):263-281.
Deontic Restrictions Are Not Agent-Relative Restrictions.Eric Mack - 1998 - Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (2):61.
Ethical relativism and the ideal observer.B. C. Postow - 1978 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (1):120-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
8 (#1,283,306)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references